Thématique: Evaluating sources
Assess GenAI output using “lateral reading”
The art of using your (artificial) intelligence wisely
OBJECTIVES
  • Fact-check GenAI output

For a general introduction to the use of generative AI at the University and the risks involved, watch this video by the University of Geneva:
HORS CLASSE #5 – Intelligence Artificielle Générative

What is lateral reading? (select only one)
Why is it important to repeat the verification process for each assertion made by the AI? (select only one)
How can human viewpoints influence the responses generated by an AI? (check each correct response)
Send
(Log on to My Space to save your results.)


Img_lecture_laterale_1_EN.png

If you are using GenAI for your academic works, it will be important to be able to verify its outputs using the most important method of analysis available to you: lateral reading. Lateral reading is done when you apply fact-checking techniques by leaving the GenAI output and consulting other sources to evaluate what the AI has provided based on your prompt.

Here's how to fact-check something you got from a GenAI tool:

  1. Fractionation: isolate specific, searchable claims within the GenAI output. 
  2. Lateral reading: open a new tab and look for supporting pieces of information. Here are some good sources to start with:
    1. When searching for specific pieces of information: Google results or Wikipedia
    2. When seeing if a reference exists: swisscovery UNIGE, Google Scholar or other databases specific to your domain
    At the same time, always check if the GenAI isn’t putting correct information, but in the wrong context. For example, is it attributing a fake article to a real author?
  3. Analyze the assumptions:
    1. What did your prompt assume?
    2. What did the GenAI assume?
    3. Who would know things about this topic? Would they have a different perspective than what the GenAI is offering?
  4. Judgment call: what here is true, what is misleading, and what is factually incorrect? 
  5. Repeat this process for each of the claims the GenAI made.

Img_lecture_laterale_2_EN.png

Eventually, when evaluating AI responses, consider that they may reflect human viewpoints and biases from the data they were trained on, not just factual accuracy.

Check out the videos below to see these lateral reading strategies in action:

Content adapted from « Artificial Intelligence and Information Literacy » by Maryland University Libraries and Teaching and Learning Transformation Center (TLTC) under CC BY NC license

Document :